| To: | Nathan Young <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [linux] LCD's & radiation |
| From: | Mitch Trachtenberg <mjtrac@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:24:50 -0700 |
|
Nathan, it's not a problem, and you are right that my experiment would be pretty dumb if you were interested in long-term effects, just like your offered PCB-in-the-tomato analogy. On the other hand, the beauty of the scientific method is precisely that it doesn't/shouldn't matter who you are; if you do a double-blind experiment and get a statistically significant result, others either have to find the problem with your experiment, repeat it without duplicating the results, call you a liar, or accept the results. If you don't do the experiment, though, I don't think you should be too surprised when people dismiss your anecdotal evidence, whether or not you sincerely believe your anecdotes are real. There are, in my opinion, a lot of people out there who confuse science with expertise, politics, expensive labs, engineering, etc... "Science" can be confused with any of those things, but no-square-quote science stands alone and can often be conducted by a single person and negligible equipment -- it's nothing more or less than a way of communicating about shared observed reality. Mitch On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Nathan Young <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Ok, this may well be my mistake... |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [linux] LCD's & radiation, Patrick Moon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [linux] LCD's & radiation, Parke Bostrom |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [linux] LCD's & radiation, Patrick Moon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [linux] LCD's & radiation, Nathan Young |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |